Written not earlier than 1908.
Published in 1937 in
the magazine Proletarskaya
Revolyutsia, No. 8
Published according
to the original.
|
[5][1]...In intellectual circles a traditional atti-
|
sic! | ||||
|
tude has been established towards philosophy....
Philosophical ideas are presented with too little and too feeble connection with any sort of class substratum....
Very many Marxists adhere to the same view.
They are convinced that a variegated medley of philosophical views is permissible in the ranks of the proletarian vanguard, that it has no great significance whether ideologists of the proletariat profess materialism or energeticism, neo-Kantian- ism or Machism....
[6]...To maintain such a viewpoint means falling
into a naïve, most grievous error.... Without exception, all philosophical terms and formulas |
|||||
|
used by it[2] ... serve |it| to denote social classes,
groups, sections and their mutual relations. When |
incorrect ⅴ | ||||
|
dealing with the philosophical system of this or
|
|||||
|
that bourgeois thinker, we are dealing with a pic-
ture of the class structure of society, depicted by |
incorrect! | ||||
|
means of conventional symbols and reproducing
the social profession de foi of a definite bourgeois group....
[7]...These pictures must not be accepted as
being something that could he utilised and brought into line with the proletarian world outlook. That would mean falling into opportunism, trying to combine what cannot be combined.... |
|||||
|
... the first brilliant attempt at this sort of re-
|
sic! | ||||
|
appraisal took place as far back as several years
ago. Comrade A. Bogdanov's article "Authoritarian |
|||||
|
Thought"[3] undoubtedly opens up a new era
|
!! | ||||
|
in the history of philosophy: after the appearance
of this article, speculative philosophy lost the right to employ its two fundamental concepts of "mind" and "body"; it was established that these concepts |
|||||
|
were formed against the background of authoritar-
ian relations and the antithesis between them |
what nonsense! |
||||
|
reflected a social antithesis-the antithesis of the
organising "top strata" and the executive "lower strata." With amazing consistency bourgeois critics ignored the work of the Russian Marxist.... |
|||||
|
[8]...In these circumstances, a social and genet-
ic analysis of philosophical concepts and system |
|||||
|
is not only desirable, but definitely necessary.
|
|||||
|
It is a task which is extremely difficult and com-
plicated.... Contemporary fashionable systems, e.g., |
|||||
|
neo-Kantianism or Machism....
|
|||||
|
[9-10]...Our essay is not intended for a limited
|
|||||
|
circle of experts.... Demos is revealing an interest
|
|||||
|
in philosophy... our exposition is of a somewhat
elementary character.... The viewpoint we are |
|||||
|
defending .... can be more easily mastered if illustrat-
ed not by unwieldy, but by economically selected material.... |
![]() |
||||
I
|
|||||
|
[11-12]...Production relations of |"authoritar-
|
| ?? | | ||||
|
ian"| society... The primitive ||savage|| every-
where begins to see the manifestation of organisa- tory will "...the executor is accessible to external |
now the nonsense is clear!! |
||||
|
senses-this is the physiological organism, the bo-
dy; the organiser is not accessible to them, he is presumed inside the body; this is the spiritual personality..." |
|||||
|
Fiction and empty phrases. Indeed, very "gen- eral" !! Words. The savage and primitive communism are slurred over. Mate- rialism and idealism in Greece as well. |
||||
|
[13]...The concept of the mind acquires an in-
creasingly abstract character. |
nothing but idealism! |
||||
|
[14]...When in the history of Greek philosophy
the famous question was raised: How is it possible for the multifarious transient phenomena of the material world to have been derived from pure, immutable, non-material substance? What is the relation of "being" to "becoming"?-it was not, contrary to the assertions of all kinds of historians of philosophy, the highest flight of noble human thought, a most altruistic effort aimed at solving the greatest mystery of the universe and thereby giving joy to the human race for all time. The matter was much simpler! To frame the question in that manner merely pointed to the fact that in the Greek towns the process of social stratifica- |
|||||
|
tion had gone a long way, that the gulf between
the "upper" and the "lower" strata of society had become deeper, and the old ideology of the organis- ers, corresponding to less differentiated social |
So, indeed! And Greek materialism? |
||||
|
relations, had lost its right to existence. Earlier,
in spite of all the distinctions between substance |
|||||
|
and the world of phenomena, the direct connection
between them had not been doubted. Now, the |
and the sceptics? |
||||
|
existence of this connection is denied. Substance
and the world of phenomena are declared to be incommensurable magnitudes. Relations between them are only possible through a series of inter- mediary links. Or, in more philosophical language, we cannot establish their reciprocal relations either by means of the senses or by means of ordinary thought: to do so requires the assistance of some special "idea," some special intuition. II
|
|||||
|
dualistic "mode of presenting the facts" explained
by Comrade Bogdanov; nevertheless, the anti- |
what nonsense! | ||||
|
thesis of organiser and executor is somewhat
veiled. Hence the corresponding antithesis of mental and corporeal, active and passive, prin- ciples, in the sphere of ideology, could not take a sharp form....
[17]...In the worskhop of the medieval artisan
there was no place for representatives of so-called |
|||||
|
untrained, unskilled labour. Work is found for
them in the manufacturing workshop. They consti- tute the "lower stratum." Above them are other strata, other groups of workers, each differing according to the degree of skill. Among them certain organising layers are already formed. Going |
e.g., trained workers and trainees un- der them |
||||
|
further up the ascending scale, we see groups of
administrators and technical managers of the enterprises. The owner of the enterprise is thus |
to page 19 | ||||
|
"freed" not only from every kind of physical labour,
but also from many purely organisational duties.... |
|||||
|
{19]...In contrast to the medieval thinkers, the
|
|||||
|
"fathers" of the new philosophy devote very much
attention in their systems to the world of transient phenomena, make a detailed study of its structure |
|||||
|
and development, the laws governing the relations
between its parts; they create a natural philosophy. The very same "elevated" position of the leaders of the manufacturing enterprises which inspired in the fathers of the new philosophy the "pure" idea |
|||||
|
of organising will, suggested to them, similarly,
a mechanical explanation of the processes of mate- rial reality, i.e., the processes taking place among the organised mass. |
![]() |
||||
|
The point is that the leader of the manufactur-
ing enterprise is merely the final link in a fairly |
|||||
|
long chain of organising links. In relation to him,
the other organisers are subordinate and, in turn, |
Who? See page 17 |
||||
|
stand in opposition to him as organised persons.
...But insofar as their role differs from that of the chief leader, insofar as it consists in taking part in the technical work from which the chief leader is "freed," to that extent their "mental" character is blurred and their activity is appraised as activity |
|||||
|
of "matter"....
|
nonsense! | ||||
|
[21-22]...The bourgeois system in general is
a two-faced Janus.... True, we find a definite formulation of dualism only in Cartesianism,- in the system created just at the dawn of the new economic era; true, subsequent philosophical systems, beginning with that of Spinoza, declare that the Cartesian counterposing of God and the world, of mind and body, is contradictory. ...The materialist and positivist systems of bourgeois philosophy, in turn, by no means testify to a triumph over the dualistic viewpoint. The differ- |
|||||
|
ence between bourgeois metaphysics and the
bourgeois "positive world outlook" is not as great as it may appear at first glance. ...The attack |
NB | ||||
|
made by materialism is not directed against the
fundamental premise put forward by metaphysics; the concept of the organising will is not done away with by materialism. It merely figures under another name: for example, "force" takes the place of "spirit".... |
|||||
|
[22-23]...In the seventeenth century, at the time
of its "storm and stress," the English bourgeoisie preached the doctrine that everything in the world should be explained as a motion of material particles taking place from mechanical necessity. The English bourgeoisie were laying the founda- |
In this vulgar- isation of the history of philosophy, the struggle of the bourgeoi- |
||||
|
tions for large-scale capitalist economy.... They
imagined the whole world in the form of an organisa- tion of material particles united in accordance with immanent laws.... |
sie against feudalism is completely forgotten. |
||||
|
[23-24]...In the second half of the eighteenth
century, the French bourgeoisie flooded the book market with similar treatises.... But we know what is meant by the internal structure of enter- prises: it is the realm of matter and mechanical |
|||||
|
processes. Hence the generalisation: man is a ma-
chine, nature is a machine.... |
not hence | ||||
|
...The motion of matter is conditioned by itself,
or rather by its own force (Holbach). The organisa- tory will, it is seen, has again become extremely transformed, but its presence is noted and is admitted to be absolutely essential. |
|||||
|
The manufacturers did not act as revolution-
ary representatives of "Sturm und Drang".... |
←? and what about their struggle against clerica- lism? Shulya- tikov has dis- torted history! |
||||
III
|
|||||
|
[25]...The organised require an organiser....
[26]...The intermediary organisatory links-
|
|||||
|
"individual minds" can only fulfil their organising
|
|||||
|
role if there exists a superior organisatory centre.
Only the latter brings them into contact with the proletariat-"matter"-within the framework of an organised whole, a manufacturing workshop.... |
NB what non- sense! the proletar- iat = mat- ter |
||||
|
[27]...The Cartesian concept of man is nothing
but the further propagation of a definite form of thinking, "a definite mode of presenting the facts, a definite type of their union in the psyche." |
|||||
|
We have seen that the world in Descartes' system
is organised on the lines of a manufacturing enter- |
nonsense | ||||
|
prise....
...We are dealing with the cult of mental labour.
|
|||||
|
[28]...I am an organiser and, as such, can exist
only by fulfilling organisatory and not executive functions: this is the meaning of the Cartesian |
![]() |
||||
|
assertion, if it is translated into the language of
class relations.... |
|||||
|
...The common, naïve viewpoint sees the external
world as it appears through the prism of the senses.... |
|||||
|
[29]...The concept of the worker as merely
a saddler or merely a paper-hanger gives way to the |
|||||
|
concept of the worker in general. Trade no longer
constitutes the "essence" of labour-power.... |
and what about Plato's "ideas"? |
||||
|
[31]...Time, Descartes explains, must not be
a property of matter: it is "a mode of considered thinking," a generic concept created by the latter.... |
|||||
|
[32-33]...Henceforth philosophy is the faithful
servant of capital. ...The revaluation of philo- |
|||||
|
sophical values was determined by changes in the
organising upper strata and organised lower strata. |
|||||
|
New organisers, new organised-new concepts of
God and spirit, new concepts of matter.... |
|||||
IV
|
|||||
|
[37]...All relations between mind and body are
only through God. All relations between the intermediary organisatory links and the organised mass are only with the sanction of the supreme organiser!... |
|||||
|
...The motion of matter and the activity of the
mind are only two aspects of one and the same process. There can be no question of any interaction |
|||||
|
between mind and matter.
[41]...Experience, sensuous perception, is for
him an imperative condition for cognising things.... |
|||||
|
[42]...But ... when Spinoza died, as is well
known, the fine fleur of the Dutch bourgeoisie with great pomp accompanied the hearse that carried his remains. And if we become more closely acquainted with his circle of acquaintances and correspondents, we again meet with the fine fleur |
|||||
|
of the bourgeoisie-and not only of Holland but
of the entire world. ...The bourgeoisie revered Spinoza, their bard. |
|||||
|
Spinoza's conception of the world is the song
of triumphant capital, of all-consuming, all-cen- tralising capital. There is no being, there are no |
infantile | ||||
|
things, apart from the single substance; there can
be no existence for producers apart from the large- scale manufacturing enterprise.... V
|
|||||
|
ily organised enterprise and is himself the supreme
organiser.... |
phrase-mon- gering |
||||
VI
|
|||||
|
quieter times began for the manufacturers: Hobbes'
materialism gave place to the half-hearted system of Locke. The further consolidation of the position 2) of manufacture determined the possibility of anti- materialist utterances. 3) |
a fine expla- nation! prim- itive mate- rialism à la Loria |
||||
|
[56]..."The attraction and repulsion of workers
should take place without any obstacles": in perceptual complexes there are decidedly no absolute elements. Everything is relative. |
what about the relativ- ism of the Greeks? |
||||
VII
|
|||||
|
in the foregoing chapters is beyond doubt....
The position of philosophical scepticism adopted
|
vague and inexact |
||||
|
by Hume corresponds precisely to such a conception
of the capitalist organism. |
Go ahead,
lump every- thing togeth- er! idealism as well as scepticism, everything "corresponds" to manufac- ture! Comrade Shulyatikov is simple, very simple. |
||||
IX
|
|||||
|
[81]...There arise systems of so-called objective
idealism....
ⅹ [88]...objective idealists....
|
?What about Fichte? Fichte? |
||||
|
[94]...But we know that in all the systems of
bourgeois philosophy "matter" is regarded as the subordinate principle (even by the materialists |
Nonsense. | ||||
|
who, we repeat, note its subordinate position by
introducing the concept of "force").... |
What about the concept of "motion"? |
||||
|
[98]...It is merely one step from Fichte's anti-
thetical method and Schelling's potentialising theory to Hegel's dialectics. And in regard to the latter, after all that has been said in this chapter about the antithetical method, it only remains for us to make a few supplementary re- |
|||||
|
marks. We have already made clear the "real
background" of dialectics. |
what nonsense! | ||||
|
Hegel merely more fully substantiated the
theory of development through "contradictions," |
|||||
|
which had been outlined by two other objective
idealists.... |
Fichte-an objective idealist!!! |
||||
|
[98-99]...The innovation made by Hegel em-
phasises the following fact from the sphere of |
|||||
|
"real" relations. The differentiation of functions
and roles in manufacture reaches its maximum. A |stratification| takes place of each separate executive group and each separate organising group. The functions belonging to any one definite group are distributed among various, newly-formed |
|||||
|
groups. Each group breaks up and new groups are
formed from it. And the ideologist of the manufac- turers considers this breaking-up process to be the |
|||||
|
process of the internal development of this or that
"principle".... |
( what non- sense! |
||||
X
|
|||||
|
[100]...Speculative philosophy loses prestige in
|
# | ||||
|
bourgeois society. True, this does not occur all
at once. But neither did the machine conquer the territory of industry all at once.... |
![]() what nonsense! |
||||
|
[101]...How can the positive nature of the
new ideological systems be explained? By the |
|||||
|
|||simple||| law of contrasts, the simple endeavour
"to do the opposite" of what constituted the "symbol of faith" of yesterday?... |
|||||
|
Individualised "complexes"-Ivan, Peter, Jacob
vanish. In their place there appears in the work- |
|||||
|
the worker in general. "Matter" is given back
the qualities that were expropriated from it.... |
) | ||||
|
[102]...Matter is rehabilitated. Bourgeois so-
ciety introduces the cult of the new idol-"environ- ment. True, in doing so, the fact is not lost sight |
![]() |
||||
|
of that nevertheless matter remains matter, i.e.,
the organised mass, and, as such, cannot exist without a "manager." And "force," as a specialist in organisatory duties, is assigned to matter. Trea- tises about Stoff und Kraft ("matter and force") are written.... |
what nonsense!
|
||||
|
[104] A comparison between the most recent
organisation of the factories and the internal structure of manufacture already a priori dictates the reply: the new variety of bourgeois philosophy should reproduce substantial features of the philos- ophy of the manufacturing epoch.... |
what nonsense! |
||||
|
[106] Neo-Kantianism gives way to a "turn"
towards systems of "pre-Kantian" thought. XI
|
|||||
|
[108]..."the object can never be separated from the
idea, or the idea from the object...." |
NB | ||||
|
[113]...The considerations that have been given
are already sufficient to define Wundt clearly as a philosopher who sets himself the task of combating materialism or, to use the fashionable term, of "Überwindung des Materialismus," "over- coming materialism," and who, in so doing, does |
|||||
|
not declare himself to be on the side of the school
which is regarded as the traditional opponent of materialism....
[114]...Such an equalisation of the intermediary
organising links and representatives of "physical" labour, the "lower executives," is indicated in the |
|||||
|
sphere of philosophy precisely by the endeavour
to characterise "subject" and "object," "psychical" and "physical," as comprising an "indivisible" whole, the endeavour to reduce the antithesis between the phenomena mentioned to a cognitive |
|||||
|
fiction. Avenarius' theory on principal coordina-
|
|||||
|
tion, Ernst Mach's theory on the relation of the
psychical and physical, Wundt's theory on ideas- objects-these are all theories of the same order.... |
this is true, but not as stated |
||||
|
[116]...Hitherto, Wundt's |monist| views
could not be denied a certain consistency. Nor can he any more be suspected of idealist sym- pathies.... |
← ha-ha! eclectic not true |
||||
|
[118]...Wundt takes just such a leap when, on
the heels of his theory on "ideas-objects", he puts forward his views on "psycho-physical parallel- ism".... |
|||||
|
[121]..."Attributes" are transformed into "se-
ries," but this reform, in essence, is more of a verbal character.... |
|||||
|
[123]...Primacy is asserted for the spiritual
principle....
[123-124]...Everything corporeal has necessarily
|
![]() |
||||
|
its psychical correlation. No single worker, however
simple the function he fulfils, can produce any products, can find any application for his labour- power, can exist, without his being under the direct, detailed "guidance" of a definite organiser.... |
![]() |
||||
|
...But the psychical series constitutes the "orga-
nisers," and the "concomitance" of the latter signi- fies for the "physical series"-for the workers- nothing but dependence.... |
![]() |
||||
|
[128]...Thus, according to Wundt, philosophy
should transcend the bounds of experience, "supple- ment" the latter. The philosophical analysis needs to be continued until we obtain the idea of a unity which embraces both series that are independent of each other. Having expressed this view, Wundt immediately hastens to make an important reserva- tion for himself: he declares that we can conceive of the unity of the world either as a material unity |
|||||
|
or as a mental unity: a third solution of the
problem does not exist.... |
![]() |
||||
|
[129]...Wundt refuses to give the name substance
to his idea of universal unity. He defines it as the idea of pure reason, i.e., in the Kantian sense. Just as Kant's God is the idea of the supreme "forming," non-substantial principle, so also Wundt's universal unity is the idea of non-sub- stantial unity, thanks to which all phenomena acquire vital meaning, indisputable value. In the light of this idea, there disappears the "empty and cheerless" philosophy which sees in the outward order of phenomena, in their mechanical connec- tion, the true essence of the latter. In its place we obtain the view of the cosmic mechanism as the external covering of spiritual activity and creation.... |
|||||
|
[130]...In this connection, Wundt strongly
emphasises the element of actuality. He reduces the idea of universal unity, of the "foundation of the world," to the idea of a universal will.... |
![]() |
||||
|
[131]...We shall not enter on an analysis of
|
|||||
|
his proposed formulation, nor shall we explain
his theory of "voluntarism"....
...Consequently, the ideologists of the modern
vanguard of the capitalist bourgeoisie cannot |
nonsense! What about |
||||
|
speak of any "permanent" organised principles
but, on the contrary, have to describe the latter as |
Schopen- hauer ? |
||||
|
something extremely changeable, something that
is eternally in a state of motion.... XII
|
|||||
|
force; it struck at an imaginary target. Wundt's
|
Ⅴ inexact | ||||
|
appearance on the scene and the subsequent reac-
|
|||||
|
tion from the camp of Avenarius'[6] disciples did
|
true! | ||||
|
not signify a conflict between the philosophies
of two different classes or two large groups of one and the same class. The socio-economic background of the philosophical contest in question was, in |
|||||
|
this case, the comparatively insignificant difference
|
correct | ||||
|
between the most advanced and the somewhat less
advanced types of modern capitalist organisa- tions....
[134]...We should say more: the empirio-critic-
|
|||||
|
al philosophy should be understood primarily as
an apologia for the idea in question. The concept of functional dependence is a denial of causal dependence.... |
that is so really?? |
||||
|
[135-136]...Heffding's conclusion must, in gen-
eral, be considered correct. Only his reference to "motives of expediency" is unfortunate: these motives are vague and indefinite. |
Of course, but it does not follow from this that func- tionality cannot be a variety of causality. |
||||
|
Avenarius, in this case, was merely making
a concession to materialist phraseology, a conces- |
really? | ||||
|
sion determined by his social position. ...To many
|
|||||
|
people the views of the "parallelists" might appear
to be materialist in comparison with vulgar spiri- |
|||||
|
tualism. The same applies to the views of empirio-
|
|||||
|
criticism. The possibility of their coming close
to materialism is particularly strong.... And wide sections of the reading public have formed the opinion that empirio-criticism is a materialist school of thought. More than that, even expert philosophers judge it erroneously: Wilhelm Wundt himself, the patriarch of modern philosophy, called it "materialism". Finally, what is most interesting of all, the empirio-critics, too, while dissociating themselves from materialism, at the same time sometimes use its terminology, and sometimes even begin as it were to waver in their anti-material- ist views.... |
Hm? a lie! why? You have not understood this! aha! |
||||
|
[137]...Such is the real background that inspired
empirio-criticism with the idea of classifying human cognition on the basis of the principle of "biological" classification. But this sort of "biol- ogy," we repeat, has nothing in common with materialism...
[138-139]...dualism-according to Avenarius-
is the fruit of a certain process of our abstracting thought-"introjection"....
But the antithesis of the "external" and "inter-
nal" world is the purest fiction.
An analysis of this antithesis is extremely
important; it should lead to substantiating the monist world outlook. Commentators of Avenarius' system of philosophy strongly stress this point. "By exposing the impermissibility of introjection," one of them says,[7] "two aims are achieved...." |
|||||
|
[140]... the subordinate organiser, if his "abso-
lute" viewpoint is adopted, i.e., if he is regarded as an organiser independent of the "will" controll- ing him, is confronted also merely by a "thing," or "body," in the shape of the workers. But let us take another case: for the supreme "will," the subordinate organiser is not only one who is orga- nised, but one who organises.... The former "object," |
oh, this is suspicious! A cheap explanation with no ana- lysis of the substance! |
||||
|
now converted into "subject," "organises" matter:
man assimilates a tree, but a tree transformed, the "notion" of tree....
[141-142]..."the fullness of human experience"
is also proved in Avenarius' theory of principal co-ordination....
...In Avenarius, like in Wundt, the "series"
turn out, in essence, to be "incommensurable." And instead of the materialist world outlook that one would expect after the categorical state- ments about "the fullness of experience," views are expressed testifying to the idealist sympathies of empirio-criticism...
But Wundt and Avenarius part company on
the road of idealist constructions. The author of The System of Philosophy reveals a fancy for "Kantian" motives. The author of The Human |
|||||
|
Concept of the World proclaims views which bring
him close to the position once taken by Berkeley. |
true? | ||||
|
Let us hasten to make a reservation. We do not
at all intend to assert that the works of the Bishop of Cloyne determined Avenarius' viewpoint, that they had a direct influence on him. But the simi- larity of the idealist positions of both philosophers is indubitable. The afore mentioned theory of |
|||||
|
principal co-ordination, taken as a whole, is evi-
dence of this similarity. |
true! | ||||
|
With the same straightforwardness as Berkeley,
Avenarius presents the thesis that there are no objects outside the subject. Each "thing" must necessarily "be related" to the central nervous system, which plays the role of functional centre....
[144]...The supreme "leader" does not figure,
|
Here Shulya- tikov is un- der a misap- prehension, |
||||
|
not even in the shape of the Kantian idea of reason,
Kant's "form," or in the shape of Wundt's "univer- sal unity." Nevertheless, he is there, and is moreover the chief element of the philosophical system. All phenomena are regarded precisely from his |
|||||
|
point of view. His "invisible" presence is postulated
|
bien! | ||||
|
by the unusually high appraisal of the organisatory
principle, presented parallel with the conception of organised organisers. And in the general picture of the world resulting from Avenarius' philosophic- al discourses, it is precisely the organisatory |
|||||
|
character of the organising factors that comes
|
hm? hm? | ||||
|
into the forefront....
|
|||||
|
For Avenarius the world represents an agglom-
erate of central nervous systems. "Matter" is absolutely deprived of all "qualities," whether a "primary" or "secondary," which at one time were considered its inalienable property. Absolutely everything in matter is determined by the "spirit" or, to use the terminology of the author of the |
a misappre- hension |
||||
|
Critique of Pure Experience, by the central nerv-
ous system.... |
|||||
|
[145] The viewpoint of idealism in the style
of Berkeley is put forward with great consistency |
NB | ||||
|
by the author of the Critique of Pure Experience....
[146]...Mach's theory of the "ego" as a logical
symbol....
Mach, like Avenarius, knows two "series"-the
psychical and the physical (two kinds of combina- tions of elements). As with Avenarius, these series are incommensurable and at the same time represent nothing but a fiction of our thought. Alternately, the monist and the dualist viewpoint is put forward: alternately the intermediary orga- nisatory links are described as the organised, and |
|||||
|
as the organising principle. And, as with Avena-
rius, in the final analysis the dictatorship of "the organisatory will" is proclaimed. An idealistic picture of the world is drawn: the world is a com- plex of "sensations." |
a misappre- hension aha! |
||||
|
[147]...Mach's objection cannot be called valid.
The central concept of his philosophical system, the famous "sensation," is by no means a denial |
a misappre- hension |
||||
|
either of the organisatory principle or of the
supreme organisatory principle.... Mach was prompt- ed in his criticism of the conception of the "ego" |
|||||
|
by the view of the subordinate organisers as the
organised "mass".... |
nonsense! | ||||
|
[148-149]...Besides dealing with the specula-
tive constructions of Wundt, Avenarius and Mach, we could, for example, subject to analysis the views of such prominent representatives of |
|||||
|
modern West-European philosophy as Renouvier,
Bradley and Bergson. |
NB | ||||
|
The sphere of philosophy is a veritable "Bastil-
le" of bourgeois ideology.... It is necessary to bear |
![]() |
||||
|
in mind that, for their part, the bourgeous ideolo-
gists are not sleeping, but are strengthening their position. At the present time, they, are even im- bued with the conviction that their position is absolutely impregnable. The "idealist" sympathies of certain literary writers who take their stand under the banner of Marxism, in turn, create particularly favourable soil for such a convic- tion.... TABLE OF CONTENTS
XI. Wundt |Ostwald| . . . .107 |not in the book The entire
book is an example of extreme vul- garisation of materialism. Instead of a concrete analysis of periods, formations, ideologies -empty phrases about "organisers" and ridiculously strained, absurdly false comparisons. A caricature of materialism in history. And it is a pity, for there is an attempt made in the direction of materialism. |
|||||
[1] The page references are to Shulyatikov's book.-Ed.
[2] philosophy.-Ed.
[3] Included in the symposium of his articles "From the Psychology of Society."-Lenin
[4] In the present case, we disagree somewhat with the explanations proposed by comrade Bogdanov. He does not attach to this last circumstance the importance it undoubtedly had; he does not even advance it. We had occasion to speak about this question elsewhere "From the History and Practice of the Class Struggle" (in the chapters devoted to the genesis of the ruling classes). Edition of S. Dorovatsky and A. Charushnikov.-Lenin
| [5] It will be recalled that Marx in Vol. I of Capital | |||
|
and K. Kautsky note the dependence between ab-
stract religious views and the development of com- modity production.-Lenin |
not in the same sense as yours |
||
| [6] Carstanjen was the first to reply.-Lenin |
Then Willy, Petzoldt (twice), Kleinpeter. |
||
[7] Rudolph Wlassak; quoted by Mach in The Analysis of Sensation, p. 52.-Lenin
| Chapter Three | | | Chapter Five (Part One) |
| Document Index | ||
| < Backwards | Forwards > | |||||
| Works Index | | | Volume 38 | | | Collected Works | | | L.I.A. Index |